Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A7R III
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
63 Imaging
78 Features
93 Overall
84
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A7R III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Raise to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 657g - 127 x 96 x 74mm
- Revealed October 2017
- Superseded the Sony A7R II
- New Model is Sony A7R IV
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A7R III Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sony A7R III, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and A7R III (42MP) and the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and A7R III (Full frame) boast totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-4 GPS was announced 4 years prior to the A7R III which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony A7R III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the WG-4 GPS matches up against the A7R III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A7R III Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Sony Alpha A7R III. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Sony A7R III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony A7R III
WG-4 GPS | A7R III |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A7R III over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
A7R III | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2017 | February 2014 | Newer by 45 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1440k | 460k | Sharper screen (+980k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony A7R III
WG-4 GPS | A7R III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A7R III Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS features outside dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Sony A7R III has measurements of 127mm x 96mm x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9") along with a weight of 657 grams (1.45 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sony A7R III in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the A7R III.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 GPS and A7R III is 90 and 63 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A7R III Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions only by seeing a spec sheet. The image here will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 GPS and A7R III.
As you can see, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The WG-4 GPS with its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony A7R III will provide extra detail with its extra 26MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged WG-4 GPS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A7R III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A7R III Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Alpha A7R III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Alpha A7R III |
Category | Waterproof | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2017-10-25 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 42 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 7952 x 5304 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 32000 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 1,440k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1(5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 235 grams (0.52 lbs) | 657 grams (1.45 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 127 x 96 x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 100 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 3523 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 pictures | 650 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Two SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II support on one) |
Storage slots | Single | Dual |
Price at release | $210 | $2,800 |