Clicky

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A7R III

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
43
Overall
41
Ricoh WG-4 GPS front
 
Sony Alpha A7R III front
Portability
63
Imaging
78
Features
93
Overall
84

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A7R III Key Specs

Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Introduced February 2014
  • Later Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Sony A7R III
(Full Review)
  • 42MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 32000 (Raise to 102400)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 657g - 127 x 96 x 74mm
  • Revealed October 2017
  • Superseded the Sony A7R II
  • New Model is Sony A7R IV
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A7R III Overview

On this page, we will be comparing the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sony A7R III, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and A7R III (42MP) and the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and A7R III (Full frame) boast totally different sensor size.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The WG-4 GPS was announced 4 years prior to the A7R III which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony A7R III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the WG-4 GPS matches up against the A7R III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony A7R III

 WG-4 GPS A7R III 

Reasons to pick Sony A7R III over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 A7R III WG-4 GPS 
RevealedOctober 2017February 2014Newer by 45 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1440k460kSharper screen (+980k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony A7R III

 WG-4 GPS A7R III 
Manual focus Very exact focus
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen size
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A7R III Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS features outside dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Sony A7R III has measurements of 127mm x 96mm x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9") along with a weight of 657 grams (1.45 lbs).

Compare the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sony A7R III in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the A7R III.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A7R III size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 GPS and A7R III is 90 and 63 respectively.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A7R III top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A7R III Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very difficult to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions only by seeing a spec sheet. The image here will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 GPS and A7R III.

As you can see, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The WG-4 GPS with its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony A7R III will provide extra detail with its extra 26MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged WG-4 GPS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A7R III sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A7R III Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A7R III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Portrait photography with Sony A7R III
41
you can focus manually
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect focusing
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
86
manual focus
excellent megapixels (42MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
has face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Street photography factors
Sony A7R III Street photography factors
59
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
more heavy than competitors (235g)
79
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
supports touch to focus
weather sealing
good high ISO (32,000)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sports photography features
Sony A7R III Sports photography features
45
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
weather sealing
max frames per second low (2.0 fps)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
bad battery (240 shots)
lack of phase detect AF
89
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
excellent megapixels (42MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
has tracking autofocus
weather sealing
great battery life (650 per charge)
supports phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Travel photography camera
Sony A7R III as a Travel photography camera
69
weather sealing
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
bad battery (240 shots)
more heavy than competitors (235g)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
74
great battery life (650 CIPA)
weather sealing
supports bluetooth
supports touch to focus
excellent megapixels (42MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Landscape photography information
Sony A7R III Landscape photography information
54
you can focus manually
pretty wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
weather sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
bad battery (240 CIPA)
87
manual focus
switch lenses (Sony E mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
excellent megapixels (42MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
does not have anti aliasing filter
good high ISO (32,000)
delivers RAW files
weather sealing
great battery life (650 CIPA)
has dual storage slots
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Vlogging with Sony A7R III
34
pretty wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
does not have microphone port
more heavy than competitors (235g)
37
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection autofocus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
comes with external mic jack
display isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A7R III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony A7R III
 Ricoh WG-4 GPSSony Alpha A7R III
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Sony
Model Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sony Alpha A7R III
Category Waterproof Pro Mirrorless
Introduced 2014-02-05 2017-10-25
Body design Compact SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz X
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Full frame
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 42 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 7952 x 5304
Maximum native ISO 6400 32000
Maximum enhanced ISO - 102400
Lowest native ISO 125 100
RAW format
Lowest enhanced ISO - 50
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 9 425
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony E
Lens focal range 25-100mm (4.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/2.0-4.9 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Number of lenses - 121
Crop factor 5.8 1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 460k dot 1,440k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 3,686k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.78x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/8000s
Continuous shutter speed 2.0 frames per sec 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 10.00 m (Auto ISO) no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye Off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 3840x2160
Video format H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.1 Gen 1(5 GBit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 235 grams (0.52 lbs) 657 grams (1.45 lbs)
Physical dimensions 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") 127 x 96 x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 100
DXO Color Depth score not tested 26.0
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 14.7
DXO Low light score not tested 3523
Other
Battery life 240 pictures 650 pictures
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model D-LI92 NP-FZ100
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures))
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal Two SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II support on one)
Storage slots Single Dual
Price at release $210 $2,800