Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A99 II
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
57 Imaging
77 Features
92 Overall
83
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A99 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Raise to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 849g - 143 x 104 x 76mm
- Launched September 2016
- Superseded the Sony A99
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A99 II Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A99 II, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and A99 II (42MP) and the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and A99 II (Full frame) have totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-4 GPS was revealed 3 years earlier than the A99 II which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony A99 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple overview of how the WG-4 GPS scores vs the A99 II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A99 II Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Sony Alpha A99 II. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Sony A99 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony A99 II
WG-4 GPS | A99 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A99 II over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
A99 II | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | February 2014 | More modern by 31 months | |
Display type | Fully articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 460k | Clearer display (+769k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony A99 II
WG-4 GPS | A99 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A99 II Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS offers external measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Sony A99 II has dimensions of 143mm x 104mm x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 849 grams (1.87 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A99 II in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-4 GPS versus the A99 II.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and A99 II is 90 and 57 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A99 II Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching a spec sheet. The image here might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and A99 II.
Clearly, both of those cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WG-4 GPS having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Sony A99 II will provide you with greater detail because of its extra 26MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged WG-4 GPS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A99 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A99 II Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Alpha A99 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Alpha A99 II |
Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 42MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 7952 x 5304 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 399 |
Cross type focus points | - | 79 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, redeye reduction, rear sync, high-speed sync, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 235g (0.52 pounds) | 849g (1.87 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 143 x 104 x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 92 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 2317 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | 490 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | NP-FM500H lithium-ion battery & charger |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC/MS Duo slots |
Card slots | 1 | Dual |
Cost at launch | $210 | $3,198 |