Clicky

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A200

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
43
Overall
41
Ricoh WG-4 GPS front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front
Portability
66
Imaging
50
Features
38
Overall
45

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A200 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Revealed February 2014
  • Refreshed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Sony A200
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
  • Introduced July 2008
  • Successor is Sony A230
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A200 Overview

Here, we will be looking at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony A200, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and A200 (10MP) and the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) offer different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The WG-4 GPS was released 5 years later than the A200 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the WG-4 GPS grades versus the A200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony A200

 WG-4 GPS A200 
IntroducedFebruary 2014July 2008More recent by 68 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 A200 WG-4 GPS 

Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony A200

 WG-4 GPS A200 
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS offers outer measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Sony A200 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).

Compare the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony A200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the WG-4 GPS compared to the A200.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A200 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 GPS and A200 is 90 and 66 respectively.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements simply by going through technical specs. The photograph here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and A200.

As you can tell, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WG-4 GPS because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will provide greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more recent WG-4 GPS should have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Portrait photography factors
Sony A200 Portrait photography factors
41
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
offers face detection focus
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
54
manual focus
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Street photography info
Sony A200 Street photography info
59
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
more heavy than competitors (235g)
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Sports photography with Sony A200
45
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
environment proof
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
terrible battery (240 shots)
lack of phase detect auto focus
50
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
slow frames per second (3.0 frames per second)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Travel photography information
Sony A200 Travel photography information
69
environment proof
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
really wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
terrible battery (240 shots)
more heavy than competitors (235 grams)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
46
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (10MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Landscape photography advice
Sony A200 Landscape photography advice
54
focusing manually
really wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
environment proof
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not available
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
terrible battery (240 CIPA)
54
manual focus
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
doesn't have liveview
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
does not have Timelapse mode
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Vlogging information
Sony A200 Vlogging information
34
really wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
no external microphone port
more heavy than competitors (235 grams)
9
lack of video recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony A200
 Ricoh WG-4 GPSSony Alpha DSLR-A200
General Information
Make Ricoh Sony
Model type Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sony Alpha DSLR-A200
Category Waterproof Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2014-02-05 2008-07-17
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 -
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 3872 x 2592
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Min native ISO 125 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 25-100mm (4.0x) -
Max aperture f/2.0-4.9 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.55x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 2.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (Auto ISO) 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video data format H.264 -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 235g (0.52 lbs) 572g (1.26 lbs)
Physical dimensions 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 63
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.3
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 521
Other
Battery life 240 images -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID D-LI92 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal Compact Flash
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $210 $100