Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-3N
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/430cc/430ccaa363774e0b8d316ec9d45b25256b0dcd11" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS front Ricoh WG-4 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7eddc/7eddc1de1900bdf7cc3907ab82968f90c4856591" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-3N front Sony Alpha NEX-3N front"
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Announced February 2013
- Earlier Model is Sony NEX-F3
- Updated by Sony a5000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
Below is a detailed review of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony NEX-3N, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the NEX-3N (16MP) is fairly similar but the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and NEX-3N (APS-C) enjoy different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The WG-4 GPS was released 12 months later than the NEX-3N so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the WG-4 GPS matches up vs the NEX-3N for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony NEX-3N
WG-4 GPS | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | February 2013 | More recent by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
NEX-3N | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony NEX-3N
WG-4 GPS | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS provides exterior dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Sony NEX-3N has proportions of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony NEX-3N in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the WG-4 GPS against the NEX-3N.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb52b/cb52b6594eefc9b073977416411cd1883f991fcf" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 GPS and NEX-3N is 90 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aab86/aab861d8dea05ea6ca73c1cb798f9706ec7b3a39" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to visualize the gap between sensor measurements only by reading technical specs. The visual here should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 GPS and NEX-3N.
As you have seen, each of the cameras posses the exact same MP but different sensor measurements. The WG-4 GPS has got the tinier sensor which is going to make getting shallow DOF harder. The fresher WG-4 GPS provides a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efceb/efcebbdbf5d12fd97d05c61e6f20d1b5b407fdcc" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0299b/0299bfeeae43537458503e5aa41037009bb0baaf" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2013-02-25 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | - |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 235 grams (0.52 lbs) | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1067 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photos | 480 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $210 | $399 |