Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX1
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41


90 Imaging
62 Features
48 Overall
56
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
- Revealed September 2014

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX1 Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony QX1, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Lens-style by rivals Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the QX1 (20MP) is fairly similar but the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and QX1 (APS-C) have different sensor size.

The WG-4 GPS was manufactured 7 months earlier than the QX1 and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the WG-4 GPS grades against the QX1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Sony Alpha QX1. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Sony QX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony QX1
WG-4 GPS | QX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | " | Larger display (+3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 0k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
QX1 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2014 | ![]() | February 2014 | More modern by 7 months |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony QX1
WG-4 GPS | QX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS features physical measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Sony QX1 has measurements of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony QX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the QX1.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 GPS and QX1 is 90 and 90 respectively.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes simply by reading specs. The pic below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-4 GPS and QX1.
All in all, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WG-4 GPS featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony QX1 will offer you extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged WG-4 GPS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX1 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Alpha QX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Alpha QX1 |
Class | Waterproof | Lens-style |
Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2014-09-03 |
Body design | Compact | Lens-style |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 357.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5456 x 3632 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.6 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | - |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 0k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 235g (0.52 pounds) | 216g (0.48 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | 440 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $210 | $500 |