Clicky

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX1

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
43
Overall
41
Ricoh WG-4 GPS front
 
Sony Alpha QX1 front
Portability
90
Imaging
62
Features
48
Overall
56

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX1 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Revealed February 2014
  • Refreshed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Sony QX1
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
  • Revealed September 2014
Photography Glossary

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX1 Overview

Following is a detailed comparison of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony QX1, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Lens-style by rivals Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the QX1 (20MP) is fairly similar but the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and QX1 (APS-C) have different sensor size.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The WG-4 GPS was manufactured 7 months earlier than the QX1 and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.

Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the WG-4 GPS grades against the QX1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony QX1

 WG-4 GPS QX1 
Display size3""Larger display (+3")
Display resolution460k0kCrisper display (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 QX1 WG-4 GPS 
RevealedSeptember 2014February 2014More modern by 7 months
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony QX1

 WG-4 GPS QX1 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry around your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS features physical measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Sony QX1 has measurements of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).

Contrast the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony QX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the QX1.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX1 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 GPS and QX1 is 90 and 90 respectively.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX1 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes simply by reading specs. The pic below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-4 GPS and QX1.

All in all, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WG-4 GPS featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony QX1 will offer you extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged WG-4 GPS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX1 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Portrait photography with Sony QX1
41
manual focus
MP count decent (16MP)
provides face detection autofocus
no manual control
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
65
focusing manually
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detect focus
exports RAW formats
no manual mode
no external flash support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Street photography with Sony QX1
59
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
heavier than competition in class (235 grams)
69
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
comes with touch focus
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
heavier than competitors (216g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sports photography details
Sony QX1 Sports photography details
45
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
weather proofing
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (240 shots)
no phase detect autofocus
56
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
good battery power (440 shots)
slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
lack of phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Travel photography information
Sony QX1 Travel photography information
69
weather proofing
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
terrible battery life (240 per charge)
heavier than competition in class (235g)
screen is not selfie friendly
71
good battery power (440 shots)
comes with touch focus
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors (216 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Landscape photography details
Sony QX1 Landscape photography details
54
manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
weather proofing
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
terrible battery life (240 CIPA)
63
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sony E mount)
MP count decent (20MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
good battery power (440 shots)
small screen (")
no manual mode
no image stabilization
missing Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Vlogging with Sony QX1
34
pretty wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic jack
heavier than competition in class (235g)
32
touchscreen
offers face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
missing mic jack
heavier than competitors (216 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony QX1
 Ricoh WG-4 GPSSony Alpha QX1
General Information
Brand Ricoh Sony
Model type Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sony Alpha QX1
Class Waterproof Lens-style
Revealed 2014-02-05 2014-09-03
Body design Compact Lens-style
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz X
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.2 x 15.4mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 357.3mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 5456 x 3632
Highest native ISO 6400 16000
Lowest native ISO 125 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 9 25
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony E
Lens zoom range 25-100mm (4.0x) -
Highest aperture f/2.0-4.9 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.6
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch -
Screen resolution 460k dot 0k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 2.0 frames/s 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (Auto ISO) 4.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) 1920 x 1080 (30p)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format H.264 MPEG-4
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 235g (0.52 pounds) 216g (0.48 pounds)
Physical dimensions 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 240 shots 440 shots
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID D-LI92 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $210 $500