Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony H400
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Portability
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony H400 Key Specs
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Sony H400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Revealed February 2014
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony H400 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony H400, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the H400 (20MP) is relatively close and they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-4 GPS was revealed within a month of the H400 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony H400 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the WG-4 GPS scores against the H400 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony H400 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Sony H400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony H400
| WG-4 GPS | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| H400 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony H400
| WG-4 GPS | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | February 2014 | Same age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has got outer measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Sony H400 has specifications of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") having a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony H400 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the WG-4 GPS compared to the H400.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 GPS and H400 is 90 and 62 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes merely by looking through technical specs. The image here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and H400.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Sony H400 to render greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Portrait photography camera
Sony H400 as a Portrait photography camera
focusing manually
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports face detect focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
megapixel count decent (20MP)
comes with face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Street photography camera
Sony H400 as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (235g)
image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
heavier than competitors in class (628 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sports photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Sports photography with Sony H400
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
supports tracking focus
weather proofing
low frames per second (2.0 fps)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
bad battery power (240 shots)
no phase detect auto focus
incredible zoom range (25-1550mm 62.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames/s)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Travel photography camera
Sony H400 as a Travel photography camera
weather proofing
decent megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
bad battery power (240 shots)
more heavy than competition in class (235 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
megapixel count decent (20MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (25mm)
great zoom (1550mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than competitors in class (628 grams)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Landscape photography information
Sony H400 Landscape photography information
focusing manually
rather wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
weather proofing
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
bad battery power (240 CIPA)
rather wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
missing Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Vlogging features
Sony H400 Vlogging features
rather wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no microphone support
more heavy than competition in class (235g)
rather wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focusing
includes external mic port
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.4)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
heavier than competitors in class (628g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony H400 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz(R) |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.4-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 8.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 X 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 235g (0.52 pounds) | 628g (1.38 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $210 | $268 |
