Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony H55
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
92 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony H55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 200g - 103 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched June 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony H55 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sony H55, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the H55 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-4 GPS was revealed 3 years after the H55 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the WG-4 GPS scores vs the H55 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony H55 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Sony H55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony H55
| WG-4 GPS | H55 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 45 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H55 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| H55 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony H55
| WG-4 GPS | H55 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony H55 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS provides exterior measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Sony H55 has proportions of 103mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sony H55 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the WG-4 GPS and the H55.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and H55 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony H55 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes merely by researching specs. The picture below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-4 GPS and H55.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to result in more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The fresher WG-4 GPS is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony H55 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony H55 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 3.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Slow Syncro, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 235 gr (0.52 lb) | 200 gr (0.44 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 103 x 58 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $210 | $235 |