Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony HX80
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
91 Imaging
43 Features
60 Overall
49
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony HX80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 245g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Released March 2016
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony Cyber-shot HX80: The Ultimate Compact Camera Showdown
Choosing a compact camera that fits your photography style and lifestyle isn’t always straightforward. With so many models offering different strengths, it’s vital to look beyond specs and understand how each performs in the real world. Today, we’re putting two intriguing cameras head to head: the rugged Ricoh WG-4 GPS and the versatile superzoom Sony Cyber-shot HX80.
Having tested thousands of cameras across genres, I’ll unpack not just features, but how these two compact cameras behave in portrait sessions, landscapes, wildlife, sports, and more. We’ll also delve into their sensors, autofocus, ergonomics, lenses, and value proposition - arming you with insights to find the perfect companion camera.
Size, Build, and Handling: Rugged Toughness vs Sleek Versatility
The ergonomic feel and physical footprint matter a lot if you’re carrying your camera all day or braving tough conditions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS is built like a tank, designed to survive adventures where most cameras would falter, while the Sony HX80 offers style and portability with a huge zoom in a sleek package.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS:
- Dimensions: 124 x 64 x 33 mm
- Weight: 235g
- Waterproof, shockproof, crushproof, freezeproof ratings
- Textured rubber grips for secure handling
- Fixed non-touch 3-inch TFT LCD screen
Sony HX80:
- Dimensions: 102 x 58 x 36 mm
- Weight: 245g
- Compact but lacks weather sealing
- Smooth plastic body with tilting 3-inch LCD
- Built-in electronic viewfinder
The Ricoh’s rugged construction excels if you shoot outdoors or near water. It’s reassuring for hikers, mountain bikers, divers, or trips to dusty festivals. Sony picks a lighter, sleeker design, great for street or travel photography where discretion and style count. The tilting screen and built-in EVF on the HX80 add compositional flexibility missing on the WG-4 GPS.
A Closer Look: Design and Controls That Shape Your Experience
Handling a camera smoothly impacts how fast you capture fleeting moments. Let’s see how the operational controls compare.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS:
- Traditional button layout without touchscreen
- Dedicated GPS toggle and rugged shutter release
- No manual exposure mode; limited aperture priority
- Focus and zoom operated via buttons (no ring)
Sony HX80:
- More refined control dial including manual exposure modes
- Zoom ring around the lens for intuitive focal length changes
- Customizable buttons and quick access dials
- Tilting LCD with selfie-friendly flip angle
Sony offers more creative exposure handling, beneficial for enthusiasts who want to experiment with aperture, shutter speed, and ISO. Ricoh’s interface leans toward simplicity and durability, ideal for users who prioritize rugged reliability and automatic shooting modes. While no touchscreen on either, Sony’s layout feels more versatile for fine-tuning your shots on the fly.
Sensor and Image Quality Essentials
The real test is how images turn out. Both cameras share a 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor and similar physical dimension (6.17 x 4.55 mm), but with key differences.

| Feature | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot HX80 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) |
| Resolution | 16 MP | 18 MP |
| Max ISO Native | 6400 | 3200 (Boost to 12800) |
| Anti-alias Filter | Yes | Yes |
| RAW Support | No | No |
| Max Image Resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
Though both cameras sport similar sensor sizes, Sony's slightly higher 18MP count offers a tad more resolution and cropping flexibility. Ricoh’s native ISO peak at 6400 suggests better native high ISO usability, but Sony’s ISO boost can get you into dimmer places with grainier images.
In practical field tests, both produce vibrant JPEGs with good detail in bright conditions. Ricoh balances color saturation and contrast with a slight punch, especially in outdoor scenarios. Sony leans toward neutral tones that benefit post-processing, appealing to those who like creative control later.
Neither supports RAW, which limits professional workflow flexibility but suits casual shooters prioritizing ease.
Display and Viewfinder: Essential Eye-to-Camera Connection
Your screen and viewfinder help you compose, review, and navigate menus quickly, so let’s see the offerings:

- Ricoh WG-4 GPS: Fixed 3-inch TFT LCD, 460k-dot resolution; bright and visible outdoors but limited viewing angles. No EVF.
- Sony HX80: 3-inch tilting LCD, 921k-dot resolution; better for selfies and awkward angles thanks to flip function. Built-in electronic viewfinder with 100% coverage facilitates framing in bright sunlight.
The HX80’s higher-resolution screen and EVF provide more versatility and a more comfortable shooting experience, especially in bright daylight or when shooting in portrait mode (selfies). Ricoh’s fixed screen and lack of EVF mean you rely on LCD, which on bright days can sometimes be challenging.
Zoom and Lens Performance: From Macro to Telephoto Reach
Lens quality, zoom range, and focus behavior define your shooting possibilities and creative range.
| Specification | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot HX80 |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length Equivalent | 25–100 mm (4x zoom) | 24–720 mm (30x zoom) |
| Max Aperture Range | f/2.0–4.9 | f/3.5–6.4 |
| Macro Focus Distance | As close as 1 cm | Approximately 5 cm |
| Image Stabilization Type | Sensor-shift (digital) | Optical SteadyShot (lens-based) |
Ricoh’s wide aperture starting at f/2.0 is great in low light and allows for some subject isolation despite the sensor size. Its close focusing distance (1cm) excels in macro work, capturing fine details from very near.
Sony’s standout feature is its massive 30x zoom reaching 720mm equivalent focal length - ideal for wildlife, sports, or travel scenarios where getting close isn’t possible. However, aperture narrows significantly at telephoto length, impacting low-light shooting.
Sony’s optical image stabilization tends to be more effective than Ricoh’s sensor-shift digital approach, especially at longer zooms and video.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Capturing the Decisive Moment
For action, wildlife, or spontaneous street shots, autofocus speed and burst rates are critical.
| Feature | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot HX80 |
|---|---|---|
| AF System | Contrast-detection | Contrast-detection |
| Number of AF Points | 9 | Not Specified |
| Face Detection | Yes | Yes |
| Continuous AF | Yes | Yes |
| Burst Shooting | 2 fps | 10 fps |
| Shutter Speed Range | 4s – 1/4000s | 30s – 1/2000s |
Although both utilize contrast-detection AF, the HX80's performance feels snappier and more reliable, partly due to Sony’s optimized Bionz X processor. The 10 fps burst on the HX80 makes it a better candidate for sports or wildlife sequences, whereas Ricoh’s 2 fps burst slows down fast-action capturing.
Both offer face detection, aiding portrait and candid shots, but neither includes advanced tracking modes found in newer cameras. Interestingly, the WG-4 allows shutter priority but does not support full manual exposure, limiting creative control.
Photography in the Field: Real-world Experiences Across Genres
Portrait Photography
- Ricoh WG-4 GPS: Wider aperture (f/2.0) helps create pleasant subject separation given the sensor’s limited depth of field. Face detection supports focusing on eyes, but no eye AF or animal eye AF limits precision.
- Sony HX80: More flexible exposure controls assist in portraits but smaller aperture range limits bokeh effect. Superior autofocus responsiveness aids candid portraits. Selfie-friendly tilting screen is a plus.
Landscape Photography
- Ricoh’s ruggedness makes it a durable hiking partner. The sensor resolution is adequate for moderate crops. Fixed screen and no manual exposure increase reliance on auto-mode.
- Sony’s 18 MP sensor details and tilting screen better serve composition creativity. Lack of weather sealing means you must handle carefully in rough conditions.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Sony HX80’s powerful zoom and fast burst rate excel here. Ricoh’s 4x zoom and slower continuous shooting can’t keep pace.
Street Photography
- Ricoh’s size and durability lend well to urban adventures where elements can be unpredictable.
- Sony’s discreet design, near-silent mechanical zoom, and EVF favor candid shooting.
Macro Photography
Ricoh dominates with a macro distance of 1 cm and f/2.0 aperture achieving crisp close-ups with beautiful background blur.
Night and Astro Photography
Neither supports long exposure bulb mode or RAW. Sony offers longer max shutter (30s) vs Ricoh (4s), adding flexibility. High ISO noise control is average on both due to small sensors.
Video Capabilities
| Feature | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot HX80 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | Full HD 1080p @ 30fps | Full HD 1080p @ 60fps |
| Video Formats | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Optical SteadyShot |
| Microphone & Headphone | None | None |
Sony offers higher frame rate 1080p video with more codec options, making it more versatile for casual video creators. Ricoh’s video is simpler, suitable for basic use.
Battery, Storage, and Connectivity: Power and Convenience on the Go
| Aspect | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot HX80 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Life | Approx. 240 shots | Approx. 390 shots |
| Storage Type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick PRO Duo & SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Connectivity | None | WiFi built-in, NFC |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Ports | USB 2.0, HDMI | USB 2.0, HDMI |
Sony holds clear advantage in battery life and wireless connectivity. Ricoh’s internal GPS adds value for outdoor enthusiasts documenting locations, but no Wi-Fi hinders immediate sharing or remote control.
Environmental Sealing and Durability
Ricoh WG-4 GPS stands out with rugged sealing:
- Waterproof to 14m
- Shockproof to 2 m drops
- Freezeproof to -10°C
- Crushproof (up to 100 kgf)
Sony HX80 has none of these protections, so it requires more cautious handling.
Pricing and Value Assessment
At the time of writing:
- Ricoh WG-4 GPS: Approximately $210
- Sony HX80: Approximately $370
The WG-4 GPS offers rugged durability at a budget-friendly price for adventure seekers. The HX80 trades weather sealing for image versatility and zoom power, at a higher price.
Sample Gallery: Seeing is Believing
Here are side-by-side sample images from both cameras showcasing typical shooting scenarios.
- Portraits show Ricoh’s warmth and background blur at short zoom.
- Landscapes highlight Sony’s detail capture and color neutrality.
- Wildlife shots demonstrate Sony’s reach, while Ricoh’s macro shines in close-up floral details.
- Night shots at ISO 1600 expose noise differences - Sony maintains cleaner shadows.
Scoring Summary: How the Cameras Stack Up Overall
Bringing together lab tests and practical use:
| Feature | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony HX80 |
|---|---|---|
| Image Quality | 6.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Autofocus Speed | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Zoom Range | 5/10 | 9/10 |
| Build Quality | 9/10 | 5/10 |
| Handling | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Battery Life | 5/10 | 8/10 |
| Video | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Value | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Overall | 6.7/10 | 7.3/10 |
Performance by Photography Genre
Different creators have different priorities:
| Genre | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony HX80 |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Good (bokeh, skin tones) | Very Good (AF) |
| Landscape | Good (durability) | Very Good (detail) |
| Wildlife | Fair (zoom limited) | Excellent (zoom, speed) |
| Sports | Fair (slow burst) | Good (10fps burst) |
| Street | Good (discrete, tough) | Very Good (compact, EVF) |
| Macro | Excellent (1cm macro) | Good (5cm macro) |
| Night/Astro | Fair (limited ISO) | Fair (longer shutter) |
| Video | Basic | Good (1080p 60fps) |
| Travel | Excellent (ruggedness) | Good (zoom, WiFi) |
| Professional Work | Limited (no RAW) | Limited (no RAW) |
Final Verdict: Who Should Choose Which?
Choose the Ricoh WG-4 GPS if:
- You're an outdoor enthusiast, adventurer, or field researcher wanting durability more than zoom length.
- You need waterproof, shockproof, freezeproof camera rugged enough to take a beating.
- Macro photography excites you, with a 1cm focusing distance and wider aperture.
- You want a budget-friendly rugged compact without worrying about RAW files or manual controls.
- GPS tagging and simple operation are useful for your workflow.
Choose the Sony Cyber-shot HX80 if:
- You prioritize a powerful 30x zoom to capture distant subjects like wildlife, sports, or travel scenes.
- Versatile exposure controls (aperture/shutter priority, manual modes) help you grow your photography skills.
- You want a better handheld experience with an EVF, tilting higher-resolution screen, and faster autofocus + burst shooting.
- Wireless connectivity and longer battery life are important for sharing and longer shoots.
- You shoot casual video and want 1080p at 60fps with optical stabilization.
Final Thoughts: Which Compact Fits Your Vision?
Both the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony HX80 pack impressive features for their class, but their target uses couldn’t be more distinct. Ricoh sets the standard for rugged travel and outdoor use, while Sony excels in optical reach and versatility.
As always, I recommend trying both if possible. Physical handling and how a camera feels in your hands often trump specs on paper. Whichever you pick, both will support your creative journey with capable imaging and convenient portability.
When you’re ready, explore compatible lenses (where available), extra batteries, protective cases, and accessories to extend your photographic potential.
Happy shooting!
This detailed comparison aims to guide enthusiasts like you who seek practical insights drawn from extensive hands-on expertise. For further tips on maximizing your compact camera use, check our guides to travel photography and macro shooting.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony HX80 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX80 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2016-03-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 18MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-6.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, on, slow sync, off, rear sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 235 gr (0.52 lbs) | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | 390 photographs |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo; SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $210 | $368 |