Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony HX9V
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
91 Imaging
38 Features
46 Overall
41
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony HX9V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 245g - 105 x 59 x 34mm
- Released July 2011
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony HX9V Overview
Let's look closer at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sony HX9V, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the HX9V (16MP) is fairly close and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-4 GPS was launched 2 years after the HX9V which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the WG-4 GPS matches up against the HX9V for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony HX9V Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Sony HX9V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony HX9V
| WG-4 GPS | HX9V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 | July 2011 | More modern by 32 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX9V over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| HX9V | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer display (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony HX9V
| WG-4 GPS | HX9V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony HX9V Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS features outside dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Sony HX9V has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sony HX9V in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the WG-4 GPS versus the HX9V.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and HX9V is 90 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony HX9V Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes only by looking through a spec sheet. The pic here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 GPS and HX9V.
Clearly, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of photographs though you may want to factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The more recent WG-4 GPS is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony HX9V Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony HX9V Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | XtraFine LCD display with TruBlack technology |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 235 grams (0.52 pounds) | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 105 x 59 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $210 | $328 |