Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX30
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
91 Imaging
44 Features
37 Overall
41
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 193g - 68 x 65 x 58mm
- Introduced September 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX30 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sony QX30, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Lens-style by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the QX30 (20MP) is relatively similar and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe WG-4 GPS was launched 7 months before the QX30 so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony QX30 being a Lens-style camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the WG-4 GPS matches up versus the QX30 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX30 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Sony QX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony QX30
| WG-4 GPS | QX30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 0k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX30 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| QX30 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 |  | February 2014 | Fresher by 7 months |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony QX30
| WG-4 GPS | QX30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX30 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has external dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Sony QX30 has sizing of 68mm x 65mm x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sony QX30 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-4 GPS and the QX30.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 GPS and QX30 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX30 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading specs. The graphic here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 GPS and QX30.
All in all, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Sony QX30 to deliver more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures more aggressively. The older WG-4 GPS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX30 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony QX30 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 |
| Type | Waterproof | Lens-style |
| Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2014-09-03 |
| Body design | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | - |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | None |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 235 gr (0.52 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 68 x 65 x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | 200 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | NP-BN, |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $210 | $348 |