Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX1
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
79 Imaging
70 Features
57 Overall
64
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0-22.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Introduced February 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX1 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony RX1, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and RX1 (24MP) and the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and RX1 (Full frame) use different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-4 GPS was brought out 12 months after the RX1 so they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the WG-4 GPS grades versus the RX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Sony RX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony RX1
| WG-4 GPS | RX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | February 2013 | More modern by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Sony RX1 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| RX1 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1229k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony RX1
| WG-4 GPS | RX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS provides physical dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Sony RX1 has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony RX1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the WG-4 GPS versus the RX1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 GPS and RX1 is 90 and 79 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes just by seeing technical specs. The image below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 GPS and RX1.
As you can tell, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WG-4 GPS due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Sony RX1 will produce extra detail having its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The younger WG-4 GPS provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX1 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 |
| Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2013-02-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 852.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.0-22.0 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 6.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 235 grams (0.52 lb) | 482 grams (1.06 lb) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 93 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 2534 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | 270 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $210 | $2,798 |