Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX10 II
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41


58 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Launched June 2015
- Replaced the Sony RX10
- Successor is Sony RX10 III

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX10 II Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX10 II, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the RX10 II (20MP) is pretty comparable but the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and RX10 II (1") possess different sensor sizes.

The WG-4 GPS was manufactured 16 months prior to the RX10 II which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the WG-4 GPS matches up vs the RX10 II for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX10 II Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Sony RX10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony RX10 II
WG-4 GPS | RX10 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 II over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
RX10 II | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2015 | ![]() | February 2014 | More recent by 16 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony RX10 II
WG-4 GPS | RX10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX10 II Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has got outer measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 II has sizing of 129mm x 88mm x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") having a weight of 813 grams (1.79 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX10 II in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-4 GPS and the RX10 II.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and RX10 II is 90 and 58 respectively.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX10 II Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements just by seeing technical specs. The graphic underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and RX10 II.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WG-4 GPS featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony RX10 II will produce greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The older WG-4 GPS will be behind in sensor technology.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX10 II Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX10 II Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2015-06-10 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | 14.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 10.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 235g (0.52 lbs) | 813g (1.79 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 531 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | 400 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $210 | $998 |