Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX100
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/430cc/430ccaa363774e0b8d316ec9d45b25256b0dcd11" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS front Ricoh WG-4 GPS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a638f/a638fbdfbf56dc62e545c2536c76ceb819a338a9" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 front"
91 Imaging
50 Features
68 Overall
57
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 240g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Announced August 2012
- Successor is Sony RX100 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX100 Overview
Here is a extensive overview of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sony RX100, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the RX100 (20MP) is very well matched but the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and RX100 (1") boast different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The WG-4 GPS was unveiled 18 months later than the RX100 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the WG-4 GPS grades vs the RX100 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX100 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Sony RX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony RX100
WG-4 GPS | RX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | August 2012 | Fresher by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
RX100 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony RX100
WG-4 GPS | RX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX100 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS features outside dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Sony RX100 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") along with a weight of 240 grams (0.53 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sony RX100 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-4 GPS versus the RX100.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8deb4/8deb4f65063052da907a48e9e10bada3210b83fb" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX100 size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX100 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and RX100 is 90 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54fd2/54fd2fe38c6fb11f83818fd54d65e342783cb378" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX100 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX100 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX100 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizing just by checking a spec sheet. The graphic below will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 GPS and RX100.
Clearly, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The WG-4 GPS with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony RX100 will resolve more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The fresher WG-4 GPS should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89825/898252e13b56142f3c54b0c8a144c32b08cca6ce" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX100 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX100 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX100 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96ced/96ceddb60f071295d440b47ebebcabf0390fc7e0" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX100 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2012-08-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | WhiteMagic TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 235g (0.52 pounds) | 240g (0.53 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 390 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 pictures | 330 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI92 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $210 | $448 |