Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX100 II
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
89 Imaging
51 Features
74 Overall
60
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX100 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 281g - 102 x 58 x 38mm
- Released June 2013
- Older Model is Sony RX100
- Successor is Sony RX100 III
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX100 II Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony RX100 II, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the RX100 II (20MP) is pretty comparable but the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and RX100 II (1") posses different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-4 GPS was released 8 months later than the RX100 II and they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the WG-4 GPS grades against the RX100 II in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX100 II Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Sony RX100 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony RX100 II
WG-4 GPS | RX100 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | June 2013 | Fresher by 8 months |
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 II over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
RX100 II | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 460k | Clearer screen (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony RX100 II
WG-4 GPS | RX100 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX100 II Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS offers external dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Sony RX100 II has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 38mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.5") with a weight of 281 grams (0.62 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony RX100 II in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-4 GPS and the RX100 II.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 GPS and RX100 II is 90 and 89 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX100 II Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing just by going through specifications. The photograph below might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 GPS and RX100 II.
To sum up, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The WG-4 GPS because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony RX100 II will show extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent WG-4 GPS provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX100 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony RX100 II Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2013-06-27 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 160 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | Xtra Fine WhiteMagic TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 15.00 m (ISO Auto (W)) |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 235g (0.52 lb) | 281g (0.62 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 102 x 58 x 38mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 67 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 483 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | 350 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10 sec. / 2 sec. / Self-portrait One-person/ Self-portrait Two-person/ Self timer Continuous (3 or 5 shots)) |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $210 | $598 |