Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T110
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
96 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-108mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
- Announced January 2011
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T110 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T110, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the T110 (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-4 GPS was manufactured 3 years after the T110 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony T110 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the WG-4 GPS scores versus the T110 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T110 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Sony T110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony T110
| WG-4 GPS | T110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 38 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony T110 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| T110 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony T110
| WG-4 GPS | T110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T110 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS comes with physical dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Sony T110 has sizing of 93mm x 56mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T110 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-4 GPS against the T110.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and T110 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T110 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes simply by checking out technical specs. The pic underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 GPS and T110.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the identical MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of photos however you really should factor the age of the cameras into account. The more recent WG-4 GPS provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T110 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T110 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2011-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | Clear Photo LCD Plus with touchscreen interface |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 2.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 235 grams (0.52 lb) | 121 grams (0.27 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $210 | $199 |