Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T900
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced February 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T900 Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sony T900, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and T900 (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WG-4 GPS was unveiled 5 years later than the T900 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the WG-4 GPS grades versus the T900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T900 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony T900
| WG-4 GPS | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 61 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| T900 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+462k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony T900
| WG-4 GPS | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS enjoys outer measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Sony T900 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sony T900 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the T900.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and T900 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing just by reading a spec sheet. The photograph here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-4 GPS and T900.
Clearly, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to offer you greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 GPS should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2014-02-05 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 460k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 235g (0.52 pounds) | 143g (0.32 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $210 | $300 |