Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T99
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
96 Imaging
37 Features
27 Overall
33
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
- Introduced July 2010
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T99 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T99, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the T99 (14MP) is very comparable and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-4 GPS was released 3 years after the T99 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony T99 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the WG-4 GPS matches up vs the T99 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T99 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Sony T99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony T99
| WG-4 GPS | T99 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 44 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony T99 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| T99 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony T99
| WG-4 GPS | T99 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T99 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS comes with outer measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Sony T99 has proportions of 93mm x 56mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T99 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the T99.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and T99 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T99 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes purely by going through specs. The pic below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and T99.
All in all, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to produce more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The younger WG-4 GPS provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T99 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony T99 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2014-02-05 | 2010-07-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red eye, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 235 gr (0.52 lb) | 121 gr (0.27 lb) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $210 | $179 |
