Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX1
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched August 2009
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX1 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX1, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and TX1 (10MP) and the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and TX1 (1/2.4") boast different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WG-4 GPS was launched 4 years after the TX1 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony TX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the WG-4 GPS grades vs the TX1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Sony TX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony TX1
WG-4 GPS | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | August 2009 | More modern by 55 months | |
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
TX1 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony TX1
WG-4 GPS | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS provides outer dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Sony TX1 has sizing of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the WG-4 GPS versus the TX1.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 GPS and TX1 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading through specs. The pic here will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 GPS and TX1.
All in all, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WG-4 GPS due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs more aggressively. The newer WG-4 GPS provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX1 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Released | 2014-02-05 | 2009-08-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 8cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 235g (0.52 lb) | 142g (0.31 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $210 | $350 |