Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX100V
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
95 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX100V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Updated by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 147g - 97 x 59 x 18mm
- Announced January 2011
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX100V Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX100V, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the TX100V (16MP) is very well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe WG-4 GPS was released 3 years later than the TX100V and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony TX100V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the WG-4 GPS scores versus the TX100V when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX100V Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Sony TX100V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony TX100V
WG-4 GPS | TX100V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | January 2011 | More recent by 38 months | |
Manually focus | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony TX100V over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
TX100V | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 460k | Clearer display (+769k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony TX100V
WG-4 GPS | TX100V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX100V Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS enjoys outer dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Sony TX100V has proportions of 97mm x 59mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX100V in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the TX100V.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and TX100V is 90 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX100V Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements merely by checking specs. The photograph here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 GPS and TX100V.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution and you can expect similar quality of images though you have to factor the age of the products into consideration. The more modern WG-4 GPS will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX100V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX100V Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Released | 2014-02-05 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | XtraFine OLED display with TruBlack technology |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 235 gr (0.52 lbs) | 147 gr (0.32 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 97 x 59 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $210 | $380 |