Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX5
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
96 Imaging
33 Features
33 Overall
33
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 148g - 94 x 57 x 18mm
- Released February 2010
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX5 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony TX5, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and TX5 (10MP) and the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and TX5 (1/2.4") enjoy different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe WG-4 GPS was released 4 years after the TX5 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony TX5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the WG-4 GPS scores against the TX5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX5 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Sony TX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony TX5
WG-4 GPS | TX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | February 2010 | More modern by 49 months | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TX5 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
TX5 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony TX5
WG-4 GPS | TX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX5 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera often, you should consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has physical dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Sony TX5 has sizing of 94mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony TX5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the WG-4 GPS against the TX5.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and TX5 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX5 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reading through technical specs. The pic below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 GPS and TX5.
As you can tell, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WG-4 GPS due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will give greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 GPS should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX5 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Released | 2014-02-05 | 2010-02-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 2.90 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 235 gr (0.52 lbs) | 148 gr (0.33 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 94 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/ Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $210 | $239 |