Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX55
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
97 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- New Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 109g - 93 x 54 x 13mm
- Introduced July 2011
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX55 Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sony TX55, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the TX55 (16MP) is very comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-4 GPS was released 2 years after the TX55 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony TX55 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the WG-4 GPS matches up vs the TX55 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX55 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Sony TX55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony TX55
WG-4 GPS | TX55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | July 2011 | More modern by 31 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX55 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
TX55 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3.3" | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 460k | Sharper display (+770k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony TX55
WG-4 GPS | TX55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX55 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS offers outer measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Sony TX55 has proportions of 93mm x 54mm x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") having a weight of 109 grams (0.24 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sony TX55 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-4 GPS against the TX55.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 GPS and TX55 is 90 and 97 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX55 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes merely by going through a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-4 GPS and TX55.
As you can see, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same MP so you should expect comparable quality of pictures though you will need to take the release date of the cameras into account. The younger WG-4 GPS is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX55 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony TX55 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55 |
Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2011-07-24 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | XtraFine OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 3.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 235 grams (0.52 lb) | 109 grams (0.24 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 93 x 54 x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | 250 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | microSD/SDHC, Memory Stick Micro |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $210 | $350 |