Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony W310
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
96 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony W310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Updated by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-112mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 137g - 95 x 55 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony W310 Overview
Below is a thorough analysis of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sony W310, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and W310 (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-4 GPS was brought out 4 years later than the W310 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony W310 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the WG-4 GPS grades vs the W310 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony W310 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Sony W310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony W310
| WG-4 GPS | W310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 50 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W310 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| W310 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony W310
| WG-4 GPS | W310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony W310 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS offers outer dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Sony W310 has measurements of 95mm x 55mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sony W310 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-4 GPS compared to the W310.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 GPS and W310 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony W310 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to see the difference in sensor measurements merely by checking out specifications. The visual below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 GPS and W310.
Plainly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to produce extra detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The fresher WG-4 GPS is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony W310 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony W310 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.0-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 235 grams (0.52 lb) | 137 grams (0.30 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 95 x 55 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $210 | $150 |