Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony W320
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
97 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Released January 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony W320 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sony W320, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the W320 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-4 GPS was unveiled 4 years later than the W320 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the WG-4 GPS scores versus the W320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony W320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony W320
| WG-4 GPS | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 50 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| W320 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony W320
| WG-4 GPS | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS offers outside dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Sony W320 has proportions of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Sony W320 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the WG-4 GPS versus the W320.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and W320 is 90 and 97 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by looking at a spec sheet. The visual here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 GPS and W320.
As you can see, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to give you greater detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The fresher WG-4 GPS provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony W320 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2014-02-05 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.7-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 4cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 235g (0.52 lb) | 117g (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $210 | $269 |
