Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-1L
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2635/a26353e306f5e5c951dff9e713c562de823a4568" alt="Ricoh WG-4 front Ricoh WG-4 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a851/5a851ef78e48f8e044878a725f768ce7cb93cf0c" alt="Samsung GX-1L front Samsung GX-1L front"
69 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-1L Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 570g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Launched February 2006
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-1L Overview
Following is a detailed assessment of the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-1L, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and GX-1L (6MP) and the WG-4 (1/2.3") and GX-1L (APS-C) offer different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The WG-4 was released 8 years after the GX-1L which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1L being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the WG-4 scores versus the GX-1L with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-1L Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 & Samsung GX-1L. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Samsung GX-1L Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung GX-1L
WG-4 | GX-1L | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | February 2006 | More modern by 97 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 210k | Sharper screen (+250k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1L over the Ricoh WG-4
GX-1L | WG-4 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung GX-1L
WG-4 | GX-1L | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-1L Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 comes with external measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung GX-1L has measurements of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 570 grams (1.26 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-1L in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the WG-4 against the GX-1L.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5f2a/d5f2aa0da297c85cbf491416bd3ebd58d42e18e9" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-1L size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-1L size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 and GX-1L is 90 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11307/11307853caddceb6afc7acaf917d3743581302a3" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-1L top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-1L top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-1L Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes merely by looking through specs. The image below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 and GX-1L.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The WG-4 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Ricoh WG-4 will result in extra detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The fresher WG-4 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08d2d/08d2dbbecc9968a6187812df7cc7ab5ad82adf84" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-1L sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-1L sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e1d2/9e1d2d8c58954321659778f065639b5d4a7aedd3" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-1L Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung GX-1L | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung GX-1L |
Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2006-02-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3008 x 2008 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 5 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 210k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 7.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 570 grams (1.26 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/MMC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $330 | $0 |