Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-20
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2635/a26353e306f5e5c951dff9e713c562de823a4568" alt="Ricoh WG-4 front Ricoh WG-4 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5098/a50987fbe1d3aed59d1942e6a355078ee6cfb4f2" alt="Samsung GX-20 front Samsung GX-20 front"
58 Imaging
53 Features
52 Overall
52
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 142 x 101 x 72mm
- Released January 2008
- Old Model is Samsung GX-10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-20 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Ricoh WG-4 versus Samsung GX-20, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the GX-20 (15MP) is relatively well matched but the WG-4 (1/2.3") and GX-20 (APS-C) have different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The WG-4 was released 6 years after the GX-20 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-20 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summation of how the WG-4 matches up versus the GX-20 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-20 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung GX-20. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery and Samsung GX-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung GX-20
WG-4 | GX-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2008 | More modern by 74 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-20 over the Ricoh WG-4
GX-20 | WG-4 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung GX-20
WG-4 | GX-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-20 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 provides external dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung GX-20 has dimensions of 142mm x 101mm x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") and a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-4 versus Samsung GX-20 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-4 compared to the GX-20.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d1b0/7d1b0cb893e8ba52eeaf99a66cc5290cb5d38a2c" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-20 size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-20 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 and GX-20 is 90 and 58 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ada7/8ada7a440a3906b3962e26e0341f9dc54ec4d860" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-20 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-20 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-20 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizes purely by checking specs. The picture underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 and GX-20.
All in all, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WG-4 due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh harder and the Ricoh WG-4 will give you more detail as a result of its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures more aggressively. The more recent WG-4 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd9b9/bd9b96c78c69ad86d9e687ebc461152563ce7319" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-20 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-20 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-20 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6cdc/d6cdc4e45eef91fd27e5f3494709f95c7624bb12" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung GX-20 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung GX-20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung GX-20 |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2008-01-24 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 15MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4688 x 3120 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) | 800 grams (1.76 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 142 x 101 x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 68 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.2 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 714 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $330 | $850 |