Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ30W
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2010
- Also Known as WB600
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ30W Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ30W, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and HZ30W (12MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WG-4 was manufactured 4 years later than the HZ30W and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the WG-4 scores versus the HZ30W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ30W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 & Samsung HZ30W. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Samsung HZ30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung HZ30W
| WG-4 | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 50 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ30W over the Ricoh WG-4
| HZ30W | WG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung HZ30W
| WG-4 | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ30W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 comes with exterior dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ30W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ30W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-4 against the HZ30W.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 and HZ30W is 90 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ30W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to see the difference between sensor measurements only by reading through specs. The photograph underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 and HZ30W.
All in all, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-4 to resolve greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer WG-4 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ30W Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung HZ30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung HZ30W |
| Also referred to as | - | WB600 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2010-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 245g (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SC/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $330 | $280 |