Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ30W
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
91 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2010
- Also Known as WB600
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ30W Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ30W, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and HZ30W (12MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-4 was manufactured 4 years later than the HZ30W and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the WG-4 scores versus the HZ30W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ30W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 & Samsung HZ30W. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Samsung HZ30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung HZ30W
| WG-4 | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 50 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ30W over the Ricoh WG-4
| HZ30W | WG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung HZ30W
| WG-4 | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ30W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 comes with exterior dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ30W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ30W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-4 against the HZ30W.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 and HZ30W is 90 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ30W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to see the difference between sensor measurements only by reading through specs. The photograph underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 and HZ30W.
All in all, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-4 to resolve greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer WG-4 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ30W Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung HZ30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung HZ30W |
| Also referred to as | - | WB600 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2010-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 245g (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SC/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $330 | $280 |