Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX100
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2635/a26353e306f5e5c951dff9e713c562de823a4568" alt="Ricoh WG-4 front Ricoh WG-4 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5277/b527708835db132b53ec37264dc6230bff75beef" alt="Samsung NX100 front Samsung NX100 front"
88 Imaging
55 Features
54 Overall
54
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 282g - 120 x 71 x 35mm
- Revealed September 2010
- Renewed by Samsung NX200
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX100 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung NX100, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the NX100 (15MP) is pretty similar but the WG-4 (1/2.3") and NX100 (APS-C) use totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The WG-4 was introduced 3 years later than the NX100 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX100 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise overview of how the WG-4 scores vs the NX100 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX100 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 & Samsung NX100. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Samsung NX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung NX100
WG-4 | NX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | ![]() | September 2010 | Fresher by 42 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX100 over the Ricoh WG-4
NX100 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung NX100
WG-4 | NX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX100 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera often, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-4 comes with outside measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX100 has proportions of 120mm x 71mm x 35mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 282 grams (0.62 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung NX100 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the WG-4 against the NX100.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6058f/6058f7d922cd51e713db5ad1c0d501abfa7b2ba6" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX100 size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX100 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and NX100 is 90 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53a1a/53a1ae872e3b3586d8924c50877a32b4ffa22db9" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX100 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX100 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX100 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing merely by going over specs. The visual here may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 and NX100.
All in all, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The WG-4 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Ricoh WG-4 will offer more detail using its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more recent WG-4 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bf45/3bf458f3d5d2e5bc3866684cf9cd8216db08c024" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX100 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX100 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX100 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eab4b/eab4b8b55df2b6ba3a9c58441106f24e64f20e98" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX100 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung NX100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung NX100 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2010-09-14 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | DRIMe Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 15MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | VGA AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 282 grams (0.62 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 120 x 71 x 35mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 62 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 563 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | 420 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $330 | $386 |