Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX11
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2635/a26353e306f5e5c951dff9e713c562de823a4568" alt="Ricoh WG-4 front Ricoh WG-4 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/083e2/083e2627ee16c701325d05e6125ad917fcb73074" alt="Samsung NX11 front Samsung NX11 front"
80 Imaging
55 Features
50 Overall
53
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX11 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 499g - 123 x 87 x 40mm
- Announced December 2010
- Previous Model is Samsung NX10
- Later Model is Samsung NX20
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX11 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX11, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the NX11 (15MP) is fairly similar but the WG-4 (1/2.3") and NX11 (APS-C) offer different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The WG-4 was launched 3 years after the NX11 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX11 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the WG-4 scores against the NX11 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX11 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 & Samsung NX11. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Samsung NX11 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung NX11
WG-4 | NX11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | December 2010 | Newer by 38 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX11 over the Ricoh WG-4
NX11 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung NX11
WG-4 | NX11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX11 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 comes with outer dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX11 has dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") with a weight of 499 grams (1.10 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX11 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-4 against the NX11.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f31ca/f31cacceead9a0b67d209ab311d6ea08e26413ae" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX11 size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX11 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and NX11 is 90 and 80 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/acbf8/acbf83605c6caf6090691185d91c20929fb5fc74" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX11 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX11 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX11 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions only by going over specifications. The pic here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 and NX11.
Plainly, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The WG-4 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Ricoh WG-4 will offer more detail utilizing its extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50374/50374adebb06fb92dd7989f7c361a90a734997a5" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX11 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX11 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX11 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7194/c7194eb097d0cd8985f92c2265a8726b9d9f8687" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX11 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX11 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX11 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung NX11 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung NX11 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2014-02-05 | 2010-12-28 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | DRIM Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 15MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 11.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 499 grams (1.10 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 123 x 87 x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 553 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 pictures | 400 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $330 | $626 |