Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX3000
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2635/a26353e306f5e5c951dff9e713c562de823a4568" alt="Ricoh WG-4 front Ricoh WG-4 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de65b/de65bfe186e39934ff695656a2380e8b4549eaed" alt="Samsung NX3000 front Samsung NX3000 front"
89 Imaging
63 Features
62 Overall
62
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 230g - 117 x 66 x 39mm
- Announced May 2014
- Superseded the Samsung NX2000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX3000 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Ricoh WG-4 versus Samsung NX3000, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the NX3000 (20MP) is fairly similar but the WG-4 (1/2.3") and NX3000 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The WG-4 was released 3 months before the NX3000 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX3000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the WG-4 grades vs the NX3000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX3000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 & Samsung NX3000. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Samsung NX3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung NX3000
WG-4 | NX3000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over the Ricoh WG-4
NX3000 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung NX3000
WG-4 | NX3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | May 2014 | Similar age |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX3000 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 enjoys exterior dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX3000 has specifications of 117mm x 66mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-4 versus Samsung NX3000 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the WG-4 vs the NX3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e968d/e968d925428a1625dd9dc413bdc84e7382b3b253" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX3000 size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX3000 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and NX3000 is 90 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97687/976876dbbd3e82e88ba3b648b0c1ef9ef93f940f" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX3000 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX3000 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX3000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading specs. The image below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 and NX3000.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The WG-4 featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Samsung NX3000 will deliver more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44731/44731633396f94e0053fce06c5c6977ef4fff227" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX3000 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX3000 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eab94/eab9463f5da6630bfb564fd426373c2edac7ef19" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung NX3000 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung NX3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung NX3000 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2014-05-26 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 35 |
Cross type focus points | - | 1 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 117 x 66 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | 370 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | B740 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2-30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $330 | $897 |