Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL102
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Alternate Name is ES55
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL102, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-4 was manufactured 5 years after the SL102 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the WG-4 matches up versus the SL102 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 & Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung SL102
WG-4 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | January 2009 | Newer by 62 months | |
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Ricoh WG-4
SL102 | WG-4 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung SL102
WG-4 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-4 enjoys outside measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has proportions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-4 vs the SL102.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and SL102 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by looking at specifications. The image below may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-4 and SL102.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 to give greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The newer WG-4 will have an advantage in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung SL102 |
Also called as | - | ES55 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | - |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lb) | 116 gr (0.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $330 | $130 |