Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL620
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL65
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Following is a extensive analysis of the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL620, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and SL620 (12MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-4 was launched 5 years after the SL620 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the WG-4 scores against the SL620 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 & Samsung SL620. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung SL620
| WG-4 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 61 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Ricoh WG-4
| SL620 | WG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung SL620
| WG-4 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 comes with physical dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung SL620 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL620 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the WG-4 against the SL620.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 and SL620 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by seeing specifications. The image underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 and SL620.
Plainly, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can expect the Ricoh WG-4 to provide greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The newer WG-4 should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung SL620 |
| Otherwise known as | - | PL65 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $330 | $200 |