Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST65
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Announced January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST65 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST65, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe WG-4 was launched 3 years later than the ST65 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief view of how the WG-4 matches up versus the ST65 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 & Samsung ST65. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung ST65
| WG-4 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 38 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Ricoh WG-4
| ST65 | WG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung ST65
| WG-4 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 has outside dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung ST65 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST65 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the WG-4 vs the ST65.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and ST65 is 90 and 99 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements purely by seeing specifications. The visual here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 and ST65.
To sum up, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 to produce greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The younger WG-4 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung ST65 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung ST65 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2011-01-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 125 | - |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $330 | $130 |