Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST80
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
96 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 118g - 92 x 55 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST80 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung ST80, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the ST80 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-4 was manufactured 4 years later than the ST80 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief summary of how the WG-4 grades versus the ST80 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST80 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 & Samsung ST80. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Samsung ST80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung ST80
| WG-4 | ST80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 | January 2010 | Fresher by 50 months | |
| Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST80 over the Ricoh WG-4
| ST80 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung ST80
| WG-4 | ST80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST80 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 provides outside dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST80 has specifications of 92mm x 55mm x 19mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 118 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung ST80 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-4 compared to the ST80.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and ST80 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST80 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing purely by researching specifications. The visual underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 and ST80.
To sum up, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 to provide you with extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images way more aggressively. The fresher WG-4 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST80 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung ST80 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung ST80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung ST80 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 4800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 118 grams (0.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 92 x 55 x 19mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $330 | $249 |