Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL240
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
95 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Additionally referred to as ST5000
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Ricoh WG-4 versus Samsung TL240, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is fairly close and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-4 was launched 4 years after the TL240 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the WG-4 scores vs the TL240 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung TL240. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung TL240
WG-4 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | January 2010 | More modern by 50 months | |
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Ricoh WG-4
TL240 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung TL240
WG-4 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-4 has outside measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL240 has proportions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-4 versus Samsung TL240 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the WG-4 vs the TL240.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 and TL240 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to see the difference in sensor sizes merely by researching a spec sheet. The picture here may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-4 and TL240.
As you can see, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 to render greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The newer WG-4 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung TL240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung TL240 |
Also called as | - | ST5000 |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Released | 2014-02-05 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4334 x 3256 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 4800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 lb) | 160g (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $330 | $171 |