Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL320
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
98 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Released February 2009
- Additionally Known as WB1000
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Ricoh WG-4 versus Samsung TL320, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and TL320 (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-4 was released 5 years later than the TL320 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the WG-4 scores versus the TL320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung TL320. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery and Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung TL320
WG-4 | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | February 2009 | Fresher by 61 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Ricoh WG-4
TL320 | WG-4 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung TL320
WG-4 | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 comes with physical dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung TL320 has dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh WG-4 versus Samsung TL320 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the WG-4 versus the TL320.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 and TL320 is 90 and 98 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing purely by viewing specifications. The visual below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 and TL320.
Plainly, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-4 to provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung TL320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung TL320 |
Also called as | - | WB1000 |
Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2009-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) | - |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $330 | $380 |