Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL500
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2635/a26353e306f5e5c951dff9e713c562de823a4568" alt="Ricoh WG-4 front Ricoh WG-4 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3208c/3208cbdbdd11e23eae5a341ac80491dad70aec44" alt="Samsung TL500 front Samsung TL500 front"
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Announced July 2010
- Alternate Name is EX1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Ricoh WG-4 versus Samsung TL500, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the WG-4 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The WG-4 was introduced 3 years later than the TL500 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the WG-4 matches up versus the TL500 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung TL500. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery and Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung TL500
WG-4 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | July 2010 | Fresher by 44 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Ricoh WG-4
TL500 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+154k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung TL500
WG-4 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you have to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 enjoys outside measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung TL500 has specifications of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-4 versus Samsung TL500 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the WG-4 and the TL500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f378a/f378aca1ca38356bddf6adeb975918f81cf5150f" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL500 size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL500 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 and TL500 is 90 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44621/446217f5b098e87c7d7e60d82d7b9d5b7fc3850c" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL500 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL500 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing just by checking technical specs. The visual below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-4 and TL500.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The WG-4 with its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Ricoh WG-4 will give greater detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6b09/e6b09018d4d5ddca4f2e03f5f2775963d0b170ca" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL500 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL500 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c08a2/c08a2f9dd8e4b1023b11df3d62ffe52572e8f252" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung TL500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung TL500 |
Also called as | - | EX1 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2010-07-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.8-2.4 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 5.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 lb) | 386g (0.85 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 40 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 129 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $330 | $527 |