Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB350F

Here, we are evaluating the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB350F, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The WG-4 was manufactured very close to the WB350F so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a concise summation of how the WG-4 grades versus the WB350F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 & Samsung WB350F. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.

For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 offers external dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has specifications of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

See the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB350F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the WG-4 against the WB350F.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and WB350F is 90 and 90 respectively.

Oftentimes, it can be difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes purely by viewing a spec sheet. The image below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 and WB350F.

Clearly, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same MP so you can expect comparable quality of photos however you have to take the age of the cameras into account.