Clicky

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB700

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Ricoh WG-4 front
 
Samsung WB700 front
Portability
98
Imaging
37
Features
21
Overall
30

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Announced February 2014
Samsung WB700
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
  • Announced December 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB700 Overview

Lets look much closer at the Ricoh WG-4 versus Samsung WB700, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The WG-4 was revealed 3 years after the WB700 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the WG-4 grades versus the WB700 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung WB700

 WG-4 WB700 
AnnouncedFebruary 2014December 2010More modern by 38 months
Manually focus Dial exact focus

Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Ricoh WG-4

 WB700 WG-4 
Screen resolution614k460kSharper screen (+154k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung WB700

 WG-4 WB700 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen sizing
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 provides physical measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung WB700 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Check the Ricoh WG-4 versus Samsung WB700 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the WG-4 compared to the WB700.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB700 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and WB700 is 90 and 98 respectively.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB700 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes merely by checking specs. The image here might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-4 and WB700.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Ricoh WG-4 to give you greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The fresher WG-4 will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB700 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Portrait photography factors
Samsung WB700 Portrait photography factors
41
has manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
provides face detection focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
30
megapixel count decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Street photography factors
Samsung WB700 Street photography factors
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
49
no moving screen
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
low max ISO (0)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB700 as a Sports photography camera
45
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
environment proof
max frames per second very slow (2.0 frames/s)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (240 CIPA)
does not have phase detect auto focus
28
megapixel count decent (14MP)
fixed focal length (()mm)
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Travel photography details
Samsung WB700 Travel photography details
72
environment proof
good MP (16MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
terrible battery pack (240 shots)
display is not selfie friendly
70
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
fast maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Landscape photography details
Samsung WB700 Landscape photography details
54
has manual focus
quite wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
environment proof
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
terrible battery pack (240 per charge)
38
fast maximum aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
lack of RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Vlogging features
Samsung WB700 Vlogging features
36
quite wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic jack
27
fast maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have mic socket
Photography Glossary

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung WB700
 Ricoh WG-4Samsung WB700
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh WG-4 Samsung WB700
Category Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2014-02-05 2010-12-28
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 6400 -
Lowest native ISO 125 -
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 9 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-100mm (4.0x) ()
Highest aperture f/2.0-4.9 -
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 460 thousand dots 614 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (Auto ISO) -
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264 H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 230g (0.51 lbs) -
Physical dimensions 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 240 images -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID D-LI92 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal -
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $330 $300