Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB750
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
93 Imaging
37 Features
50 Overall
42
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Released September 2011
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Here is a detailed analysis of the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB750, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and WB750 (13MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-4 was revealed 2 years later than the WB750 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the WG-4 scores vs the WB750 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 & Samsung WB750. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung WB750
| WG-4 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | September 2011 | Fresher by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Ricoh WG-4
| WB750 | WG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung WB750
| WG-4 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 has outside measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung WB750 has measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB750 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the WG-4 versus the WB750.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and WB750 is 90 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizing just by looking through specifications. The graphic underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 and WB750.
To sum up, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can count on the Ricoh WG-4 to result in extra detail because of its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The newer WG-4 provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung WB750 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 13MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $330 | $339 |
