Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB800F
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Ricoh WG-4 versus Samsung WB800F, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is very close and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-4 was brought out 14 months later than the WB800F making them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the WG-4 grades vs the WB800F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung WB800F
WG-4 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | January 2013 | More recent by 14 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Ricoh WG-4
WB800F | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung WB800F
WG-4 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Exact same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 has exterior measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-4 versus Samsung WB800F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-4 compared to the WB800F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 and WB800F is 90 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements merely by looking through specifications. The graphic underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 and WB800F.
Plainly, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact resolution and you should expect comparable quality of images however you may want to factor the production date of the cameras into account. The younger WG-4 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung WB800F |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | - |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $330 | $300 |