Clicky

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Ricoh WG-4 front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Launched February 2014
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Released January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB800F Overview

Its time to look a little more in depth at the Ricoh WG-4 versus Samsung WB800F, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is very close and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The WG-4 was brought out 14 months later than the WB800F making them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the WG-4 grades vs the WB800F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung WB800F

 WG-4 WB800F 
ReleasedFebruary 2014January 2013More recent by 14 months

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Ricoh WG-4

 WB800F WG-4 
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung WB800F

 WG-4 WB800F 
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display measurements
Display resolution460k460kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 has exterior measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

See the Ricoh WG-4 versus Samsung WB800F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-4 compared to the WB800F.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 and WB800F is 90 and 92 respectively.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements merely by looking through specifications. The graphic underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 and WB800F.

Plainly, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact resolution and you should expect comparable quality of images however you may want to factor the production date of the cameras into account. The younger WG-4 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Portrait photography information
Samsung WB800F Portrait photography information
41
manual focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
comes with face detect focus
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
44
focusing manually
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
has face detect focusing
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Street photography factors
Samsung WB800F Street photography factors
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (218g)
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Sports photography advice
Samsung WB800F Sports photography advice
45
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
weather sealing
max fps low (2.0 frames per second)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (240 shots)
no phase detect auto focus
53
great zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16MP)
has tracking focus
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Travel photography factors
Samsung WB800F Travel photography factors
72
weather sealing
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
bad battery pack (240 CIPA)
does not have selfie friendly screen
69
lighter than competition (218g)
decent megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
really wide (23mm)
great zoom (483mm)
missing Timelapse function
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-4
Landscape photography with Samsung WB800F
54
manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
weather sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
bad battery pack (240 CIPA)
50
focusing manually
really wide (23mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
missing Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Vlogging information
Samsung WB800F Vlogging information
36
pretty wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
lack of microphone port
35
really wide (23mm)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (218 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
missing microphone port
Photography Glossary

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung WB800F
 Ricoh WG-4Samsung WB800F
General Information
Company Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh WG-4 Samsung WB800F
Category Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2014-02-05 2013-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Min native ISO 125 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-100mm (4.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 460k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech TFT LCD TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 16 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 2.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 10.00 m (Auto ISO) -
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 230 grams (0.51 pounds) 218 grams (0.48 pounds)
Physical dimensions 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 240 pictures -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model D-LI92 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $330 $300