Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
70 Imaging
62 Features
38 Overall
52
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Launched February 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sigma. The image resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is pretty close but the WG-4 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) boast different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe WG-4 was introduced about the same time to the DP2 Quattro which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the WG-4 grades versus the DP2 Quattro for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 & Sigma DP2 Quattro. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
| WG-4 | DP2 Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Ricoh WG-4
| DP2 Quattro | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
| WG-4 | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 | February 2014 | Same age | |
| Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 comes with physical measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the WG-4 vs the DP2 Quattro.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 and DP2 Quattro is 90 and 70 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes purely by researching technical specs. The picture below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 and DP2 Quattro.
As you can tell, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WG-4 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will render greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots way more aggressively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sigma |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
| Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2014-02-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TRUE III engine |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 395 grams (0.87 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $330 | $931 |