Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
70 Imaging
62 Features
38 Overall
52
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Launched February 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sigma. The image resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is pretty close but the WG-4 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) boast different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-4 was introduced about the same time to the DP2 Quattro which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the WG-4 grades versus the DP2 Quattro for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 & Sigma DP2 Quattro. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
| WG-4 | DP2 Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Ricoh WG-4
| DP2 Quattro | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
| WG-4 | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 | February 2014 | Same age | |
| Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 comes with physical measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the WG-4 vs the DP2 Quattro.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 and DP2 Quattro is 90 and 70 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes purely by researching technical specs. The picture below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 and DP2 Quattro.
As you can tell, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WG-4 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will render greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots way more aggressively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sigma |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
| Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2014-02-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TRUE III engine |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 395 grams (0.87 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $330 | $931 |