Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2635/a26353e306f5e5c951dff9e713c562de823a4568" alt="Ricoh WG-4 front Ricoh WG-4 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53260/53260c3f32c0116ecea3ddbd9713300719affe62" alt="Sigma DP3 Merrill front Sigma DP3 Merrill front"
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 75mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Succeeded the Sigma DP2 Merrill
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sigma DP3 Merrill, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sigma. The image resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the DP3 Merrill (15MP) is relatively close but the WG-4 (1/2.3") and DP3 Merrill (APS-C) have totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The WG-4 was revealed 14 months later than the DP3 Merrill which makes them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP3 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the WG-4 matches up versus the DP3 Merrill in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 and Sigma DP3 Merrill. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery and Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sigma DP3 Merrill
WG-4 | DP3 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | More recent by 14 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP3 Merrill over the Ricoh WG-4
DP3 Merrill | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sigma DP3 Merrill
WG-4 | DP3 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 enjoys outside measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sigma DP3 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") having a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sigma DP3 Merrill in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-4 and the DP3 Merrill.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8a41/b8a41892db5905d7ac9a2e78e29161e0662b459f" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and DP3 Merrill is 90 and 83 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab9c0/ab9c087e600a43c1ac1a02eb9eec4d91d8824ab7" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to visualise the difference in sensor measurements simply by viewing technical specs. The graphic underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 and DP3 Merrill.
As you have seen, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WG-4 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Ricoh WG-4 will result in more detail because of its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30a5c/30a5c32860fe28a995cac12fbb8a4107dba006c6" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30f68/30f6849dce55373811e10f62a873c7ba877bd98a" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Sigma DP3 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Sigma DP3 Merrill |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4704 x 3136 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 75mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 330 grams (0.73 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $330 | $1,353 |