Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A9 II
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
62 Imaging
76 Features
93 Overall
82
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A9 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Push to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 678g - 129 x 96 x 76mm
- Announced October 2019
- Old Model is Sony A9
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A9 II Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sony A9 II, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and A9 II (24MP) and the WG-4 (1/2.3") and A9 II (Full frame) boast different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe WG-4 was launched 6 years earlier than the A9 II which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony A9 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the WG-4 grades against the A9 II in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A9 II Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 and Sony Alpha A9 Mark II. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery and Sony A9 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony A9 II
WG-4 | A9 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A9 II over the Ricoh WG-4
A9 II | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2019 | February 2014 | More modern by 68 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1440k | 460k | Clearer screen (+980k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony A9 II
WG-4 | A9 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A9 II Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 offers exterior measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Sony A9 II has measurements of 129mm x 96mm x 76mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 678 grams (1.49 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sony A9 II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view scale comparison of the WG-4 against the A9 II.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 and A9 II is 90 and 62 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A9 II Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizes just by reviewing technical specs. The image here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-4 and A9 II.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WG-4 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Sony A9 II will offer you more detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged WG-4 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A9 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A9 II Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Alpha A9 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Alpha A9 Mark II |
Type | Waterproof | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2019-10-03 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 51200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 204800 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 693 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,440 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 20.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 lbs) | 678g (1.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 129 x 96 x 76mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | 690 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous, 3 or 5 frames) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) |
Storage slots | Single | 2 |
Launch cost | $330 | $4,498 |