Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Introduced October 2008
- Replacement is Sony A99
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and A900 (25MP) and the WG-4 (1/2.3") and A900 (Full frame) boast totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-4 was announced 5 years after the A900 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the WG-4 matches up against the A900 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony A900
| WG-4 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 | October 2008 | Newer by 65 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Ricoh WG-4
| A900 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 922k | 460k | Sharper display (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony A900
| WG-4 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | No Touch display |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 features outer dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony A900 has specifications of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the WG-4 vs the A900.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 and A900 is 90 and 54 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by checking out technical specs. The pic below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 and A900.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The WG-4 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony A900 will produce greater detail with its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more recent WG-4 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2008-10-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 25MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6048 x 4032 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/250s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) | 895 grams (1.97 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 79 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1431 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | 880 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-FM500H |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
| Card slots | Single | Two |
| Price at launch | $330 | $2,736 |