Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
54 Imaging
65 Features
62 Overall
63
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Introduced October 2008
- Replacement is Sony A99
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and A900 (25MP) and the WG-4 (1/2.3") and A900 (Full frame) boast totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-4 was announced 5 years after the A900 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the WG-4 matches up against the A900 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony A900
| WG-4 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 | October 2008 | Newer by 65 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Ricoh WG-4
| A900 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 922k | 460k | Sharper display (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony A900
| WG-4 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | No Touch display |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 features outer dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony A900 has specifications of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the WG-4 vs the A900.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 and A900 is 90 and 54 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by checking out technical specs. The pic below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 and A900.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The WG-4 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony A900 will produce greater detail with its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more recent WG-4 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2008-10-22 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 25MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6048 x 4032 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/250s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) | 895 grams (1.97 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 79 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1431 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | 880 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-FM500H |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
| Card slots | Single | Two |
| Price at launch | $330 | $2,736 |