Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Introduced October 2008
- Replacement is Sony A99
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and A900 (25MP) and the WG-4 (1/2.3") and A900 (Full frame) boast totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-4 was announced 5 years after the A900 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the WG-4 matches up against the A900 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony A900
WG-4 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | October 2008 | Newer by 65 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Ricoh WG-4
A900 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 922k | 460k | Sharper display (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony A900
WG-4 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 features outer dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony A900 has specifications of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the WG-4 vs the A900.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 and A900 is 90 and 54 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by checking out technical specs. The pic below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 and A900.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The WG-4 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony A900 will produce greater detail with its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more recent WG-4 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A900 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2008-10-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 25MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6048 x 4032 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) | 895 grams (1.97 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 pictures | 880 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Card slots | Single | Two |
Price at launch | $330 | $2,736 |