Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-F3
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
86 Imaging
57 Features
60 Overall
58
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Launched August 2012
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-C3
- New Model is Sony NEX-3N
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-F3, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the NEX-F3 (16MP) is very similar but the WG-4 (1/2.3") and NEX-F3 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-4 was revealed 18 months later than the NEX-F3 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a simple summary of how the WG-4 grades versus the NEX-F3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-F3 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 and Sony Alpha NEX-F3. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery and Sony NEX-F3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony NEX-F3
| WG-4 | NEX-F3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | August 2012 | Fresher by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Ricoh WG-4
| NEX-F3 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony NEX-F3
| WG-4 | NEX-F3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera often, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 has exterior dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sony NEX-F3 has sizing of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-F3 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the WG-4 versus the NEX-F3.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 and NEX-F3 is 90 and 86 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by reading technical specs. The photograph here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 and NEX-F3.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature the identical megapixels but not the same sensor sizing. The WG-4 includes the tinier sensor which is going to make getting bokeh harder. The fresher WG-4 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 |
| Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2012-08-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) | 314 grams (0.69 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 73 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1114 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | 470 shots |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $330 | $470 |
