Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony QX1
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
90 Imaging
62 Features
48 Overall
56
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
- Launched September 2014
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony QX1 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony QX1, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Lens-style by competitors Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the QX1 (20MP) is pretty well matched but the WG-4 (1/2.3") and QX1 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe WG-4 was revealed 7 months before the QX1 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the WG-4 matches up against the QX1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony QX1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 and Sony Alpha QX1. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery and Sony QX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony QX1
| WG-4 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 0k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Ricoh WG-4
| QX1 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 | February 2014 | More recent by 7 months | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony QX1
| WG-4 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 enjoys outer measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony QX1 has measurements of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony QX1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the WG-4 against the QX1.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 and QX1 is 90 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements only by looking at technical specs. The visual underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 and QX1.
As you can tell, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The WG-4 with its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sony QX1 will give you greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older WG-4 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony QX1 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Alpha QX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Alpha QX1 |
| Type | Waterproof | Lens-style |
| Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2014-09-03 |
| Physical type | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 357.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | - |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lb) | 216g (0.48 lb) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | 440 photographs |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $330 | $500 |