Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony a3500
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2635/a26353e306f5e5c951dff9e713c562de823a4568" alt="Ricoh WG-4 front Ricoh WG-4 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a8dd/4a8dd561f31a1ef05032a3f55300768a5c6ad484" alt="Sony Alpha a3500 front Sony Alpha a3500 front"
69 Imaging
63 Features
54 Overall
59
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony a3500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Announced March 2014
- Older Model is Sony A3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony a3500 Overview
Here is a thorough comparison of the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony a3500, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the a3500 (20MP) is relatively comparable but the WG-4 (1/2.3") and a3500 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The WG-4 was revealed very close to the a3500 so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony a3500 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise view of how the WG-4 scores vs the a3500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony a3500 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 & Sony Alpha a3500. The full galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Sony a3500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony a3500
WG-4 | a3500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony a3500 over the Ricoh WG-4
a3500 | WG-4 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony a3500
WG-4 | a3500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | March 2014 | Same age |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony a3500 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-4 provides physical dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sony a3500 has proportions of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") along with a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony a3500 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the WG-4 vs the a3500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7dfbf/7dfbfff83b3782fef63e7969eb73dd47e745cc78" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony a3500 size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony a3500 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 and a3500 is 90 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5a2a/d5a2a4a615079d3b8d727a280edfbd0847eff067" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony a3500 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony a3500 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony a3500 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizing simply by checking out specs. The visual here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 and a3500.
All in all, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The WG-4 using its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony a3500 will provide more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures way more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff130/ff1307f0d75ab7b0328c983db2bb01155f7867c2" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony a3500 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony a3500 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony a3500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07ccd/07ccd85c61b009d4cfe6f03bc425bf895db0ba30" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony a3500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony a3500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony a3500 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Alpha a3500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Alpha a3500 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2014-03-21 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | BIONZ image |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5456 x 3632 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.47x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) | 411 grams (0.91 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | 470 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $330 | $398 |