Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A6400
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
83 Imaging
69 Features
88 Overall
76
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A6400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Raise to 102400)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 403g - 120 x 67 x 50mm
- Revealed January 2019
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A6400 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sony A6400, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and A6400 (24MP) and the WG-4 (1/2.3") and A6400 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-4 was released 6 years before the A6400 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony A6400 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the WG-4 grades versus the A6400 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A6400 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 & Sony Alpha a6400. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Sony A6400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony A6400
WG-4 | A6400 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6400 over the Ricoh WG-4
A6400 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2019 | February 2014 | More modern by 60 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 922k | 460k | Clearer display (+462k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony A6400
WG-4 | A6400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A6400 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 features exterior dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sony A6400 has measurements of 120mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") having a weight of 403 grams (0.89 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sony A6400 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the WG-4 versus the A6400.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and A6400 is 90 and 83 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A6400 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizes just by reviewing specifications. The picture underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 and A6400.
Plainly, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The WG-4 because of its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh more difficult and the Sony A6400 will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged WG-4 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A6400 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony A6400 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Alpha a6400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Alpha a6400 |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2019-01-15 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 32000 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Off, auto, on, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, XAVC-S |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 lbs) | 403g (0.89 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 120 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 83 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | 410 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $330 | $898 |