Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX1
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41


67 Imaging
32 Features
36 Overall
33
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 544g - 115 x 83 x 92mm
- Launched April 2009

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX1 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sony HX1, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and HX1 (9MP) and the WG-4 (1/2.3") and HX1 (1/2.4") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.

The WG-4 was introduced 4 years after the HX1 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the WG-4 scores versus the HX1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Sony HX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony HX1
WG-4 | HX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | April 2009 | More modern by 59 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony HX1 over the Ricoh WG-4
HX1 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony HX1
WG-4 | HX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 has outer dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sony HX1 has specifications of 115mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 544 grams (1.20 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sony HX1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view size comparison of the WG-4 compared to the HX1.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and HX1 is 90 and 67 respectively.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes merely by going through technical specs. The picture underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 and HX1.
As you have seen, each of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WG-4 using its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Ricoh WG-4 will produce extra detail using its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more recent WG-4 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX1 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2014-02-05 | 2009-04-22 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 9MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-560mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 9.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1440x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 544 gr (1.20 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 115 x 83 x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $330 | $47,999 |