Clicky

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX300

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Ricoh WG-4 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front
Portability
63
Imaging
44
Features
51
Overall
46

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Released February 2014
Sony HX300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
  • 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
  • Released February 2013
  • Replaced the Sony HX200V
  • New Model is Sony HX400V
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX300 Overview

On this page, we will be evaluating the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sony HX300, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the HX300 (20MP) is pretty similar and both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The WG-4 was revealed 12 months later than the HX300 which means that they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the WG-4 matches up vs the HX300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Sony HX300

 WG-4 HX300 
ReleasedFebruary 2014February 2013Fresher by 12 months

Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Ricoh WG-4

 HX300 WG-4 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution921k460kSharper screen (+461k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Sony HX300

 WG-4 HX300 
Manually focus Dial exact focus
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurement
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 has got external measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sony HX300 has specifications of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") and a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).

Examine the Ricoh WG-4 versus Sony HX300 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the WG-4 against the HX300.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX300 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 and HX300 is 90 and 63 respectively.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by reviewing technical specs. The photograph below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 and HX300.

As you can tell, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Sony HX300 to offer you greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The newer WG-4 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Portrait photography factors
Sony HX300 Portrait photography factors
41
has manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
features face detect focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
42
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 as a Street photography camera
Sony HX300 as a Street photography camera
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
50
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Optical)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
heavier than competition (623g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh WG-4
Sports photography with Sony HX300
45
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
features tracking focus
weather sealing
slow frames per second (2.0 fps)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
not so great battery life (240 shots)
has no phase detect auto focus
55
excellent zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 as a Travel photography camera
Sony HX300 as a Travel photography camera
72
weather sealing
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
not so great battery life (240 per charge)
display is not selfie friendly
54
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
great reach (1200mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (623 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Landscape photography details
Sony HX300 Landscape photography details
54
has manual focus
quite wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
weather sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
not so great battery life (240 shots)
48
you can focus manually
really wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
missing Time Lapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh WG-4
Vlogging with Sony HX300
36
quite wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone jack
25
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing mic jack
heavier than competition (623g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh WG-4 vs Sony HX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-4 and Sony HX300
 Ricoh WG-4Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Sony
Model type Ricoh WG-4 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
Class Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2014-02-05 2013-02-20
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 5184 x 3888
Max native ISO 6400 12800
Minimum native ISO 125 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-100mm (4.0x) 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/2.8-6.3
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 460k dot 921k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 2.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (Auto ISO) -
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye -
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format H.264 -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 230g (0.51 lbs) 623g (1.37 lbs)
Physical dimensions 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 240 shots -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID D-LI92 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) -
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal -
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $330 $339